Indiana Economic Growth

The jobs keep coming, but we need qualified workers

Steve Dwyer, Conexus Indiana

Indiana’s manufacturing sector has gotten better at churning out an important product recently – new jobs for Hoosiers.

Last week, the Wall Street Journal reported that Indiana leads the nation in job creation this year, buoyed by  industrial growth.  A closer look at data provided by the state’s Department of Workforce Development shows that we’ve added nearly 12,000 new manufacturing jobs in 2010 (only the broad ‘professional business services’ category has added more positions).

This trend is consistent with the economic forecast released by Conexus Indiana as part of our annual Manufacturing and Logistics Report Card – economists from the Ball State Bureau of Business and Economic Research predicted a sharp manufacturing recovery during the second half of 2010 and 2011.  The state’s total manufacturing compensation is projected to grow by nearly $2.5 billion during this period, after falling or staying flat since mid-2007.

Once again, reports of manufacturing’s demise were greatly exaggerated:  The recession took its toll, but every downturn brings a recovery.  The domestic auto industry suffered plummeting sales, bankruptcies and bailouts – but Indiana has attracted international auto plants and seized high-tech opportunities in electric vehicles.  Global competition has challenged U.S. manufacturers – but Indiana has led the nation in attracting foreign manufacturing jobs.  Traditional jobs have disappeared – but high-skill manufacturing careers have emerged.

In short, every challenge is also an opportunity, and Indiana’s heritage of manufacturing strength and innovation prepared us to take advantage.

Recent positive stories like Chrysler’s $300 million investment in its Kokomo plants, EnerDel’s plans to double job creation in Central Indiana, and the recent acquisition of the vacant Delco Remy factory in Anderson by S&S Steel aren’t just isolated announcements, but part of a broader growth trend.  And it’s even more remarkable because we’re starting from a higher plateau – Indiana already has the most manufacturing jobs per capita of any state in the union.

But we can’t afford to be lulled into complacency by good news.  Long-term prosperity is achievable only if we’re willing to outwork and outthink the global competitors eager to challenge our success.

This means making the most of this recovery, maintaining a competitive tax climate and continuing an aggressive economic development effort to make Indiana an attractive destination for manufacturing investment.  We also have to look beyond the next business cycle and concentrate on the strategic issues that will determine our competitiveness for the long-term.

Human capital is clearly one of these issues.  Indiana’s high school graduation rate ranks in the middle of the pack, and we’re among the least-educated states in terms of college graduates in our workforce.  In all, just a third of Hoosier adults hold at least a two-year degree.   At a time when new manufacturing jobs demand high-tech skills and problem-solving capabilities, workers with a high school diploma (or less) just can’t make the grade.  And with Baby Boomer workers retiring in greater numbers (and the average age of the Indiana manufacturing worker hovering around 50), the state faces a looming shortage of qualified employees.

We can’t have sustainable job growth without a parallel focus on education.  Ultimately, trying to grow our economy without training our workforce only frustrates the ambitions of both the companies that can’t find skilled workers and the Hoosiers who continue to find themselves unqualified for better jobs.

Conexus Indiana is working with our industry and educational partners to create new training programs appropriate to emerging careers in manufacturing and logistics, while encouraging young Hoosiers to enroll in these programs through the ‘Dream It. Do It.’ marketing outreach campaign – learn more at dreamitdoitindiana.com. 

In any business you’re always either gaining or losing momentum – for the moment, Indiana is moving forward.  But to keep it up, we still need to make the education connection:  Filling manufacturing jobs doesn’t mean just matching workers with empty spots on an assembly line.  It means sending our workforce back to school – that’s how Indiana will keep our manufacturing edge. 

Steve Dwyer is President & CEO of the Conexus Indiana advanced manufacturing and logistics initiative.

Check out this thoughtful editorial (appearing in today’s Indianapolis Star) by Chairman of Wheaton Worldwide Moving and CICP Board member Steve Burns – Steve addresses criticisms of the Indiana Department of Education’s goal of having 25% of Hoosier students pass at least one Advanced Placement exam during their high school careers.

When education is inextricably linked with higher incomes and career opportunities and Indiana is struggling to improve the number of our high school grads who pursue and complete higher education, the AP focus is clearly on target – and we need to aim higher, not make excuses. 

TO THE EDITOR:

A recent letter to the editor from Lynette Enz Liberge about high school Advanced Placement exams (‘AP classes don’t always equal upward mobility,’ June 13) has a strange and disturbing message for Hoosier students, educators and policymakers: “Aim lower – maybe you won’t be disappointed.”

Indiana’s Department of Education asserts that a quarter of all the state’s students should pass at least one AP exam during their high school careers.  This assertion is based on a statewide analysis of PSAT exams which show that 33% of Indiana’s 2008 graduates had the potential (based on proven expectancy tables) to pass an AP exam.  

Liberge calls this “unreasonable,” and seems to suggest that only students from upper-income families are equipped to succeed in Advanced Placement classes and get a head start on their college studies.  Affluent communities like Carmel, Fishers and Zionsville may be able to reach such a lofty goal, but others need not apply.  (She fails to mention that North Central High School, with 37% of its students on free or reduced lunch programs, is among the top dozen AP performing schools in the state.)

At a time when we must push every student to do better and hold every teacher and administrator accountable for learning achievement, we need to set higher goals – not settle for excuses. 

For disadvantaged students especially, enrolling in AP classes is a first step towards a better life; indeed, towards upward mobility.  The data isn’t up for debate:  Americans with more education have higher incomes and lower unemployment. 

A college graduate – on average – earns nearly twice as much as someone with just a high school diploma, and almost three times as much as a high school dropout.  Recent studies from IU tell us that jobs requiring a college degree are expected to grow at a double-digit clip over the next five years in Indiana.  Jobs that don’t require education beyond high school will see sluggish growth, below 10%.  Education equals more career opportunities and bigger paychecks.

AP coursework sets the stage for success in college, and therefore success in the job market.  Students who successfully pass one AP exam are four times more likely to complete a four-year degree as those who don’t.

Of course it may be harder for children from more difficult socioeconomic circumstances to excel in advanced placement programs.  But  these students certainly have the potential to excel – common sense and the PSAT analysis I mentioned earlier tell us that.  But somewhere along the line, they aren’t being inspired to live up to their natural abilities.

Students of all backgrounds need to be encouraged to do their best, to graduate high school and go on to pursue higher education.  Their economic futures depend on it.  Advanced Placement classes challenge students and get them on the right path to tackling college coursework. 

Telling students that it’s OK not to pursue AP credits because their parents don’t make enough money or the classes might be too hard is a message that only helps perpetuate poverty.  Reasonable people can argue about the right strategies or resources necessary to get more students through AP classes –but it’s destructive to simply project one’s own pessimism onto a whole generation of Indiana students.  By lowering expectations, we lower their chances for success in school and in life.

Stephen Burns

Burns is Chairman of Indianapolis-based Wheaton Worldwide Moving, and serves on the Board of Directors of the Central Indiana Corporate Partnership.

Recent reports seem to indicate that Indiana has weathered the recession and is near the vanguard of the economic recovery – while too many Hoosiers are still unemployed or underemployed, and facing other financial hardships, we’re further along than many of our neighbors.

Most recently, the Wall Street Journal reports that Indiana leads the nation in private sector job creation in 2010.  Department of Workforce Development data confirms that the state has added nearly 50,000 new jobs since December – one of every ten positions created in the U.S. happened here, with manufacturing and ‘professional services’ leading the way.

At the regional level, the Brookings Institute places the Indianapolis metropolitan area in its “second-strongest” tier in its ongoing measurement of the economic performance of the 100 largest metros in the U.S.  Our relatively low unemployment, stable housing prices and strong Gross Metropolitan Product growth put us in good stead, ahead of most of Midwestern areas.  While St. Louis and Columbus (OH) joined Indianapolis in the ‘second strongest’ category, Louisville, Cincinnati, Milwaukee and Nashville found themselves in the middle tier.  Chicago, Detroit and Dayton slipped into the bottom levels.

The numbers are heartening, and there’s also cause for optimism ahead.  Indiana continues to boast the most business-friendly tax climate in the Midwest – as the recovery gathers steam, we’ll be among the most attractive destinations for new investment.  Indiana also made an impressive jump in venture capital investment over the past year, climbing from 41^st to 20^th in VC investment per capita.  This says great things about our ability to grow our own new companies and diversify our economy moving forward. 

Clearly, Indiana still has many hurdles to overcome – strengthening our workforce and closing the income gap that continues to plague Hoosiers, to name just two – but we seem to have positioned ourselves to take advantage of the economic comeback that’s starting to take hold across the country.

First U.S.-China Advanced Vehicle Summit pays off in productive dialogue, new deals between Chinese and Indiana companies

ESN hosts delegation of Chinese officials and auto executives, sharing the state’s expertise in electric vehicle technology development and manufacturing

(INDIANAPOLIS, Ind., May 28, 2010) Nearly 100 Chinese government officials, trade association leaders and auto executives visited Indiana on Thursday and Friday for the first U.S.-China Advanced Technology Vehicle Summit, organized by the Energy Systems Network (ESN) on behalf of Indiana’s leading manufacturers of components and technologies for hybrid electric vehicles.  The event featured several signed deals, substantive dialogue between the two groups, and the promise of more business opportunities for Hoosier companies in the world’s fastest-growing automotive market.

“It’s appropriate that we hold the Advanced Vehicle Summit on the eve of the Indy 500 here in the racing capitol of the world,” noted Joe Loughrey, ESN chairman and retired president of Cummins.  “Indiana is also in a race to attract new jobs and investment in the electric vehicle industry, and this Summit presents us with a historic opportunity.”

Indiana participants in the Summit included Allison Transmission, Cummins, Delphi, EnerDel, and Remy International.  The lengthy list of Chinese companies included BYD, Chery, Dongfeng Electric Vehicle, Shanghai GM, FAW Group, Geely and others.  All of China’s major state-owned, joint venture and private auto manufacturers are producing or have announced plans for hybrid and electric models; the country is projected to grow its global share of the electric vehicle market from 3% to 35% over the next decade.

“This is the largest delegation of Chinese automotive company executives and officials to travel to the United States to visit with American automotive parts manufacturers,” noted Assistant Minister of Commerce Wang Chao. “We are confident the visit will result in stronger business relationships between the Chinese and American automotive companies, especially for hybrid and electric vehicles.”

Assistant Minister Wang Chao’s confidence was shared by Indiana officials, and quickly proved to be well-founded.  On Thursday, Indianapolis-based EnerDel signed a joint venture agreement with Wanxiang Group, the largest auto parts producer in China, to provide advanced lithium-ion battery systems.   The deal between the two Summit participants could more than double EnerDel’s job creation plans for Central Indiana, to 3,000 new green jobs.

“We’re excited about our new partnership with Wanxiang and we look forward to the many other opportunities for collaboration this ESN summit has presented,” said Charles Gassenheimer, Chairman of Ener1, the corporate parent of EnerDel, and a Board member of ESN.  “Meetings like this one set the stage for companies like EnerDel to build new mutually beneficial relationships with Chinese businesses looking west for strategic partners.”

Along with the EnerDel-Wanxiang deal, the China Investment Promotion Agency and the Indiana Economic Development Corporation signed a Memorandum of Understanding to strengthen future trade and economic development opportunities on Friday morning.  Strategic cooperation agreements between Cummins and two Chinese companies, Guangxi Liugong Machinery and Zhengzhou Yutong Group, were also signed. 

Finally, an agreement between the Energy Systems Network, the China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronics, and the China Association of Automotive Manufacturers set the stage for future meetings.  “We’re pleased to announce that our organizations have agreed to explore another Summit, this time in Beijing, focused on the broader new energy technologies market,” said ESN President Paul Mitchell.

“The Summit is paying off in new jobs and investment,” Mitchell continued.  “These Indiana manufacturers have attracted more than $300 million in federal stimulus grants for advanced batteries and vehicle electrification, and we’re pleased to help them leverage these investments into global business opportunities.”

The U.S.-China Advanced Technology Vehicle Summit was co-presented by the Energy Systems Network, the China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronics, and the China Association of Automotive Manufacturers.  In addition to presentations by U.S. and Chinese companies during the day-long Summit, events included a welcome dinner hosted by Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels and a Friday evening dinner reception hosted by Indianapolis Mayor Gregory Ballard featuring keynote remarks by David Sandalow, Assistant Secretary for Policy and International Affairs for the U.S. Department of Energy.

Later this week, our Energy Systems Network initiative will be hosting a historic meeting between the largest delegation of Chinese automakers ever to visit the U.S. and the growing cluster of Indiana firms that are manufacturing components for electric cars and trucks.  The U.S.-China Advanced Technology Vehicle Summit is a first-of-its-kind forum that represents a global opportunity for Hoosier companies.

China is the world’s fastest-growing market for electric cars, and this Summit will set the stage for stronger relationships and new business opportunities among the participants while showcasing Indiana as a potential site for future investment.

Indiana participants in the Summit include EnerDel, Remy, Allison Transmission, Cummins and Delphi.  EnerDel is one of the region’s brightest economic development success stories of the last few years, and the other firms are mainstays of our manufacturing economy that have positioned themselves on the cutting-edge of the hybrid electric market.  Visiting Chinese companies include such powerhouses as Chery, Geely, Dongfeng and BYD (recently ranked #1 on Bloomberg BusinessWeek’s Tech 100 list).

We’re optimistic that the Summit will pay off relatively quickly in new business opportunities for Indiana firms, supplying more components to the booming Chinese market (China is already the fastest-growing market for Hoosier exports).  The longer-term prospects for Chinese investment in Indiana are also intriguing.  I’d like to excerpt a piece I wrote back in 2008 after a trip to Shanghai:

Back in the 1980s, Americans watched with growing concern as Japanese manufacturers captured a growing share of our markets – in cars, consumer electronics and steel.  There was an outcry against ‘unfair competition;’ publicity-seeking congressmen went so far as to smash Japanese-made TVs and radios on the Capitol lawn.  Here in Indiana, Japan even became an issue in the 1988 campaign for Governor, with barbs about “giveaways” to Japanese companies. 

Fast forward twenty years, and the landscape has completely changed:  Japanese investment is universally recognized as a fundamental strength of Indiana’s economy.  Foreign firms employ more than 90,000 Hoosier manufacturing workers, with companies like Toyota, Honda and Subaru leading the way.  The attraction of the Greensburg Honda plant is recognized as the signature economic development victory of Governor Daniels’ first term. 

Japan has turned from economic villain to valued partner.  It’s an experience we should learn from as we look towards China, another Asian powerhouse that’s stirring protectionist fears.  How can Indiana anticipate and take advantage of future investment from China, as its economy reaches the tipping point that Japan started to reach 20 years ago?  I recently read an interesting report from Deloitte Consulting (“The Coming Investment Wave from China”) that starts providing some of the answers.

To be certain, with the country’s massive population and resources, Chinese companies are still focused on domestic growth, serving international customers through exports.  But this is changing – in 2007, Chinese firms invested a record $37 billion in foreign countries, a 76% increase over 2006.  In Zhejiang Province in eastern China, an epicenter of private development, nearly 900 private companies invested overseas in 2006.

According to the Deloitte report, the list of industries that will experience the first wave of Chinese foreign investment will be topped by the automotive sector, one of Indiana’s strong suits.  Other key industries for overseas investment include pharmaceuticals and electrical equipment – other areas where Indiana has a significant base, existing workforce and fast-growing exports to China. 

The driving forces behind Chinese foreign investment are also likely to mirror the Japanese overseas wave, including the desire to get closer to customers and integrate distribution and supply chain functions.  Indiana’s central geography and strong transportation infrastructure can serve us well in meeting these needs, just as with Japanese automakers and other international firms.

All of China’s major automotive companies have released or announced plans for electric models, and international partnerships and joint ventures are very much a part of their plans.  This Summit could mark the beginning of significant and long-term economic benefits for Indiana.  Read more here and here.

Please take a moment to read this excellent editorial by Eli Lilly & Company Chairman (and CICP Board member) John Lechleiter on Lilly’s drive for innovation, keeping new medicines in the pipeline.

Central Indiana is fortunate to be home to global corporations like Eli Lilly that are so focused on innovation, and willing to invest in it.  Looking at the issue macro-economically, the most innovative regions are also the most prosperous.  Study after study shows that the places with the most patent activity, R&D investment and educated, creative workers also have the highest per capita incomes and strongest economic growth.

Unfortunately, the innovation advantage that the U.S. has traditionally enjoyed over the rest of the world seems to have eroded in recent years.  New ideas simply aren’t coming to market the way they used to – initial public offerings (IPOs) were down 70% from 2007 to 2008, and even though they bounced back to some degree in 2009, last year was also the worst year in more than a decade for venture capital investment.

Smaller entrepreneurial firms are often (and rightfully) seen as the major engine of innovation in today’s economy.  But large corporations like Eli Lilly can also recognize the innovation imperative, and lead the way – to the overall benefit of our regional economy.

A recent report released by the major global life sciences trade organization provides further validation of our state and regional strength in the bio-economy.

The Battelle Institute and the Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) released their annual “State BioSciences Initiatives” report at the BIO International Conference in Chicago earlier this week.  The results show that the major life sciences firms headquartered in Central Indiana and across the state continue to thrive, and that the efforts of BioCrossroads and others are paying off in encouraging new opportunities and entrepreneurial growth.

Among the highlights – Indiana has outpaced the nation in life sciences job growth over the last decade.  Indianapolis ranks second in the nation in metropolitan employment in pharmaceuticals, leading other Central Indiana metros like Lafayette, Bloomington, and Columbus that also ranked among the leaders (adjusted for size) in this sector. 

The Bloomington MSA also ranked number one among smaller metros in the Medical Device and Equipment sector.  (The BIO report did not include Warsaw, Indiana, home to nearly a third of the global orthopedic device industry, because it did not rank among the metros ranked due to population.)

The report overall shows that Indiana’s life sciences sector demonstrates strength across a number of industry sub-sectors, displaying a healthy economic diversity and potential for continued growth.  It echoes a comment from the June 4, 2009 edition of The Economist that our colleagues at BioCrossroads are fond of quoting: “Though every state wants to be a hub for life sciences, Indiana really is one...”

Learn more about the BIO/Battelle report here.

Last Wednesday’s Indianapolis Star printed a version of this excellent editorial by Central Indiana Transit Task Force co-chair John Neighbours, reacting to news of the fiscal uncertainties swirling around the IndyGo bus system.  The dismal state of IndyGo burdens both its users, who find it difficult to get to work or other daily errands due to long delays and inconvenient routes, and also local companies that depend on the bus to bring employees and customers to their places of business.

A more secure source of local funding for the system is certainly necessary;  the best solution is a more comprehensive regional system that provides reliable service across the metro area, and is financed and governed accordingly.  We believe the Central Indiana Transit Task Force has presented such a plan, summarized here.

(As a side note, I’ll be addressing the need for regional mass transit in my remarks to the Economic Club of Indiana this afternoon.)

Lack of reliable transit impedes economic growth

Erika Smith’s recent reporting on the fiscal plight of IndyGo paints a picture of a woefully under-funded public transit system in crisis.  It’s a picture that’s all-too familiar for those who rely on IndyGo on a daily basis.

IndyGo ranks 100^th among the top 100 U.S. metropolitan areas in transit funding, to serve the 26^th-largest metro population, leading to inconvenience and delay.  Let’s say you live near 10^th and Rural, and want to get to work near the Pyramids (96^th Street and Michigan Road) by 8:00am – you’d need to walk to the bus stop around 6am, to begin a one-and-a-half hour trip.  The employee of a company at Park 100 on the northwest side who has the misfortunate to live near 46^th Street and Arlington would suffer through a two-and-a-half hour commute (each way). 

These aren’t unusual scenarios.  For those who are dependent on transit, the current system effectively shuts the door on job opportunities and turns simple trips to the grocery store or doctor’s office into painfully-long  journeys.  For businesses dependent on public transit to connect them to a reliable workforce, IndyGo is a barrier to growth, a drag on economic competitiveness.

There is a better way.  In February, the private sector-led Central Indiana Transit Task Force released a comprehensive regional transportation plan that includes a light and commuter rail network, new highway investment and an expanded regional bus system. 

While the rail lines capture much of the public attention, it’s the bus system that actually receives the majority of new operating funds in the plan.  We don’t just envision fixing IndyGo, but transforming it into a regional system that allows commuters to move easily around Indianapolis and the surrounding counties.  The bus network would include more cross-town routes and higher levels of service, cutting wait times and connecting with rail to provide more transportation options for all.

The urgent need to provide adequate bus service is also reflected in the Task Force’s recommendations for public consideration.  While rail infrastructure is built over several years, bus improvements would begin immediately – offering tangible benefits right away.

A comprehensive and convenient bus system is the backbone of any successful transit system, and the private sector blueprint prioritizes and invests accordingly.  The plan is currently on the table for public comment through the ‘Indy Connect’ campaign of the Metropolitan Planning Organization (offer your own feedback at www.indyconnect.org).  Because buses are the closest and most relevant form of transit to much of the region’s population, we expect the agency to receive a large amount of input on how to better serve their riders.

The other major issue is funding.  Financing IndyGo through property taxes is a recipe for failure.  No one wants higher property taxes; indeed, we believe that mass transit investments can help keep property taxes under control by spurring more residential and commercial development. 

The transportation system should be funded by other local options, like small increases in sales or income taxes – funding the entire proposed regional rail and bus system would cost the average family between $10 and $20 a month in new sales taxes, for example.  That’s the price of a large pizza in exchange for greater mobility, a more convenient commute, and the other economic and environmental benefits of transit.

The sorry state of IndyGo lends urgency to the broader issue:  We need a regional, comprehensive transportation system that includes new mass transit options, like the plan envisioned by the Central Indiana Transit Task Force.  It’s time to agree on the approach, find the best way to pay for it, and make it happen.

John Neighbours

Neighbours is a partner at Baker & Daniels, serves on the Board of the Greater Indianapolis Chamber of Commerce, and was co-chair of the Central Indiana Transit Task Force.

Plotting a post-Rust Belt future for the Midwest

Carol D’Amico

What is the future of Midwest cities that have been heavily dependent on the automotive industry?  That was the issue we discussed at a White House symposium last week held at the U.S. Department of Labor in conjunction with the Brookings Institution, a Washington DC think tank.  Representatives from Ohio, Michigan and Indiana attended to discuss our common challenges as we seek to revitalize an economic base that’s traditionally reliant on automotive manufacturing.

A few observations from the day:  First of all, we should be very proud that our region still makes things for a living.  As one participant remarked, we have been and still are innovators.  Things we can't live without were invented in the Midwest - cars, refrigeration, air conditioning, and the bar code among countless others.  The Midwestern work ethic combined with our propensity to “tinker” and seek continuous improvement have helped us build a rich manufacturing heritage.  These traits can  continue to serve us well if we are smart about it.

What also struck me is we have common aspirations to diversify our dependence on the automotive industry and to be the leader in life sciences, alternative energy, logistics and bio agriculture.  We discussed common problems like difficulty in funding of start-up companies and the bias lenders have against manufacturing (too often dismissed as an industry stuck in the past, even as it invests more than any other U.S. economic sector in R&D innovation).  And perhaps the biggest issue of all, the challenge of up-skilling an older, entrenched workforce and shaking off our “rust belt” image to attract young talent to our landlocked states.

For that day we were in solidarity, confronting these common challenges and brainstorming solutions.  But outside the DC conference room,  we are fierce competitors when it comes to attracting new jobs and investment to our states.  It isn’t realistic to think that each of us can  be the leader of the new industries.  One of us is going to be better at it than the others.  So what will it take to stand out in this crowded field and how competitive is Indiana in the race?

First, the basics.  Indiana boasts a pro-growth tax climate.  Central geography and strong infrastructure.  Aggressive and well thought-out economic development efforts.  Enlightened and energized leadership.  All areas in which we excel.

We’ve also already made significant progress towards diversifying our manufacturing sector.  According to an analysis by Ball State University’s Bureau of Business Research, Indiana’s automotive and auto parts manufacturing industry employs more than 110,000 Hoosiers.  This is a tremendous number, but it represents just 16% of the state’s total manufacturing jobs.  Indiana also boasts strength in high-growth areas like pharma and medical device manufacturing, aerospace, HVAC and others.  And even within the automotive sector, we’re positioning ourselves as leaders in more cutting-edge areas like vehicle electrification.

Our Achilles heel in this race is the quality of our workforce.  A recent report that was done showed that we have 108,812 adults of workforce age who have less than a ninth grade education; another 273, 086 have less than a high school diploma.  This year over half the recipients of unemployment insurance lacked a high school diploma.  Unlike the old days, there are no good paying jobs for those adults.  Another 1,125,166 adults have only a high school diploma and no college.  These adults too have limited opportunities in the new economy we aspire to build. 

Until we get serious about addressing this issue our ability as a state to be the economic development leader among the Midwest states is problematic.  And it isn’t just the Midwest states that we compete with – it is all other states and the industrialized world. 

There are no easy fixes – this was the primary takeaway from  our event last week.  We need a more robust adult education system; a more effective K-12 system; colleges focused on graduating more adults within a reasonable period of time; and a modern, government-supported workforce development system instead of the antique we operate under today built in 1945 for a very different economy and era.  Indiana’s progress towards these goals will define our competitive advantage in manufacturing for generations to come. 

D’Amico is Senior Advisor to Conexus Indiana, the state’s advanced manufacturing and logistics initiative.

Mass transit has clear economic benefits in linking our workforce to job opportunities across the Indianapolis metropolitan area, to the advantage of both prospective workers and the businesses that hire them.  Transit infrastructure also pays off in new development opportunities in the adjacent neighborhoods – as in Dallas, where $4.2 billion in business and new housing sprang up along the DART (Dallas Area Rapid Transit) system between 1999 and 2007. 

But transit also adds to the general quality of life of our region by increasing mobility and connectivity to both employment and cultural/recreational amenities.  It makes a ‘walkable urban’ lifestyle a more realistic choice.  It’s an investment in convenience for commuters and visitors, in environmental sustainability and building more vibrant communities.

These are values that are broadly shared, especially by the next generation of young professionals – the up-and-coming college graduates who are choosing where to begin their professional lives or pursue new career opportunities. 

For Central Indiana, continuing to attract new business opportunities and investment in the knowledge-based economy means building a highly-educated, highly-skilled workforce – and that means being a destination of choice for young talent. 

An editorial by Sara Laycock in yesterday’s Star does a great job making the case for mass transit as a necessary investment in our human capital pipeline.  Please take a moment to read it here.

Featured today on Inside Indiana Business:

Hoosier students must graduate high school ready to succeed

Mark Miles

Last week, the Indiana Commission for Higher Education began providing a valuable new tool for Indiana high schools – specific reports that show how many of each school’s graduating class went on to college, where they enrolled, and how many required remedial math or English classes once they made it to campus.

I’m guessing that many, if not most, school districts are in for a rude awakening when they receive these reports.  Statewide data show that more than a quarter of all recent Hoosier high school graduates needed at least one remedial class as college freshmen.  Two-thirds of all community college students needed remediation.  We aren’t preparing our students at the K-12 level to succeed in higher education.

This creates a domino effect that eventually takes a steep toll on our economic competitiveness.  It places another burden on our higher education system, forcing these institutions to teach material that should have been mastered in high school.  The students who receive remediation start out behind and struggle to catch up – less than ten percent graduate from a four-year college program in six years or achieve a two-year degree within three.

These trends contribute to our generally dismal educational track record.  Just a third of Hoosier adults hold at least a two-year degree.  Indiana is mired in the middle of the pack in associates degrees awarded per capita, and we’re one of the least-educated states in the nation as measured by four-year college graduates in our adult population.

 In today’s economy, failing to complete some education beyond high school is tantamount to surrendering to a life of low wages, high unemployment and missed opportunities.  The days when a high school diploma served as a ticket to a good job at the local factory are long gone.  Indiana’s fastest-growing industries, like the life sciences and technology fields, demand a highly-skilled workforce.  In manufacturing, traditional assembly line jobs have disappeared at a dizzying pace, while new jobs (in areas like electric vehicles and aerospace) require advanced training.

At the macro level, a weakening workforce discourages new business investment in Indiana, as growing companies look to states and regions with strong human capital to locate and expand.

So what are some ways that can better prepare our young people to carry on their education after high school?

Many of our strategic economic initiatives are already working to address this issue.  BioCrossroads’ I-STEM initiative provides resources for K-12 teachers to better educate their students in the STEM disciplines – science, technology, engineering and math. 

Conexus Indiana is working to develop a high school curriculum that will prepare students to take advantage of high-tech careers in advanced manufacturing and logistics, leading them seamlessly into technical training and associate’s degree programs.  Conexus is also working with ‘champions’ (teachers and counselors) in 28 area high schools to promote careers in these industries to students, emphasizing technical education and the need for training beyond high school.

TechPoint has focused on alternative school models, sponsoring the New Tech High program at Arsenal Tech through its Foundation.  The New Tech program integrates technology and 21^st century learning strategies into the state curriculum, and is getting results.  Currently, the New Tech students’ passing rate for the Indiana Graduation Qualifying Exam is twice that of any other open-entry program on Arsenal’s Tech’s campus of 2,700 students.

We also have to recognize that the issues that hinder students from graduating from high school ready for college begin long before ninth grade.  During the legislative session, CICP was part of an effort to refocus our schools on early reading education, including a policy ending social promotion from 3^rd to 4^th grade unless students can read at grade level.  This is consistent with the Indiana Department of Education and State Board of Education, both of which have made reading education the top priority. 

It’s clear that students who have serious problems with reading early on continue to struggle throughout their academic careers – many drop out before graduating from high school, and their chances of completing a college degree are nearly nonexistent.  Making sure that these students get the extra attention they need starting in the critical K-3 years is an approach that will eventually lead to graduating classes more prepared to tackle post-secondary coursework.  Ultimately, the General Assembly empowered the Indiana Department of Education to enact this critical reform as part of a broader strategy for improving reading achievement.

There’s no ‘silver bullet’ strategy that will make every high school graduate ready for college or post-secondary training on day one.  But the data being generated by the Commission for Higher Education show that this is a challenge that demands our attention, part of the ‘big picture’ effort to raise our educational attainment and build a stronger workforce.  Being ready to continue one’s education after high school means being ready to succeed in our knowledge-based economy, and to be a valuable contributor to Indiana’s economic success.

Mark Miles is the President & CEO of the Central Indiana Corporate Partnership.

As the legislative session comes to a close, hopes are high that lawmakers will advance the cause of reading education by allowing the Indiana Department of Education to end social promotion from 3^rd to 4^th grade if students aren’t reading at grade level.  Reading is the basic skill that makes all other learning possible – it’s common sense that if students are falling behind, schools should be obligated to get them the help they need to catch up rather than simply passing them along and compounding their struggles.

Unfortunately, some defenders of the current system would rather pay lip service to reading reform than accept the core responsibility of teaching our kids.  For example, John Ellis, executive director of the Indiana Association of Public School Superintendents, recently penned an editorial in the Indianapolis Star that rejects the idea of retaining students who can’t read at the end of third grade.

The Indiana Department of Education and State Board of Education have made early reading education a top priority.  They’ve endorsed a policy framework that includes increased classroom time allocated to reading, intensive professional development for teachers on research-based reading instruction, and tools for assessing student reading proficiency on an ongoing basis in grades K-3, to catch problems early and devote more existing resources to struggling readers.

Under this model, retention is a last resort – a final opportunity to get students back on track with more intensive instruction on reading (not just holding back students in the same classroom with the same approach).

Mr. Ellis conveniently ignores this broader strategy and issues dire predictions of ‘mass retention.’  But if reading is the most important activity in our classrooms, and schools have 3,500+ hours of instruction from kindergarten to 3^rd grade within which to teach kids to read, how little confidence must Ellis have in our public schools – his constituents – to fulfill their fundamental duties? 

He also attempts to undermine the progress made in Florida, which ended social promotion as part of an approach similar to what Indiana envisions.  Florida actually climbed from 31^st to 21^st in 4^th grade public school reading scores from 2002-2007, cutting failure rates by a third.  (During the same time, Indiana slid from 15^th to 27^th in national reading scores.)  He implies that minority students were left behind by the Florida reforms – in fact, African-American, Latino, and low-income students all improved their reading performance in Florida from 2003-2007 while closing the ‘achievement gap’ with the general student population (Gauging the Gaps: A Deeper Look at Student Performance – The Education Sector).

Questionable statistics are a poor answer to inarguable logic:  Our schools must teach their students to read. Absent new instructional strategies and measures holding them accountable, the job won’t be done.

Ellis reaches a rhetorical low when he says that the retention policy would ‘label our children as failures.’  No one is calling children failures.  It’s our schools that are failing too many of their students, and this has to change.

Mr. Ellis closes with an excerpt that cites more questionable studies and asserts that “…learning is difficult when leaders or anyone else is driven by ideology.”  I’d submit that the issue here isn’t ideological, but it does involve two competing philosophies:  Ours embraces accountability, his seems wedded to the status quo.  When it comes to preparing future generations of Hoosiers to succeed in school and in life, we can’t afford the latter.

I wanted to draw your attention to this insightful column by former Cummins Vice-Chairman Joe Loughrey, who chairs CICP’s Conexus Indiana and Energy Systems Network initiatives.  Loughrey emphasizes the need for a proactive focus on workforce development to maintain Indiana’s competitive edge in ‘green economy’ areas like vehicle electrification (as highlighted by the U.S. Department of Energy's visit to Indianapolis-based EnerDel last week). 

A version of this piece appeared in today’s Star, here.

Keep focus on tomorrow’s workforce

Joe Loughrey

Last week, a delegation from the U.S. Department of Energy visited Central Indiana to finalize a $118 million grant to Indianapolis-based EnerDel, the only current U.S. manufacturer of lithium ion batteries for hybrid and plug-in electric vehicles.

Leveraging this grant and private investment, EnerDel is creating more than 1,400 new jobs in Central Indiana, building a new manufacturing facility in Greenfield.  It’s a major economic success story for the region.

EnerDel is just part of a growing ‘green vehicle’ industry in the state.  Last year, Think North America chose Elkhart as the site of the first U.S. factory for its line of electric cars.  In Anderson, Bright Automotive is also engineering state-of-the-art plug-in hybrids.  Established Indiana manufacturers like Cummins, Remy, Delphi and Allison Transmission are also major producers of hybrid components.

We can be proud that Indiana is a leader in putting electric vehicles on the road, helping our environment and making the U.S. less dependent on foreign oil.  Taking advantage of the growing market for plug-ins and hybrids is also good for Indiana’s economy.  But we do face a longer-term challenge to sustaining and strengthening this leadership position in the green economy – educating the next generation of employees for this fast-growing, rapidly-evolving industry.

The factories that produce hybrids and plug-ins are increasingly high-tech, just like the cars themselves.  These vehicles feature microcontrollers and other advanced technologies, along with the standard automotive electronics – installing, testing and troubleshooting these components takes a skilled workforce, with technical training beyond high school or two-year associates degrees.

It’s not just the green automotive industry that requires more educated employees.  There are very few ‘low skill’ jobs left in manufacturing in general today.  In a study by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (‘A Leaner, More Skilled U.S. Manufacturing Workforce’), economists divided manufacturing jobs into low-, medium- and high-skill and observed that between 1982 and 2002, high-skill manufacturing occupations grew 37% while low- and medium-skill jobs declined 24% and 18% respectively.

Indiana boasts a rich reservoir of engineering talent and a strong manufacturing workforce – it’s a key competitive advantage that allowed us to attract companies like EnerDel, and why other clean technologies firms are looking to locate and expand in the state.  But to maintain this edge, we have to ensure that our workforce pipeline stays strong, with young workers getting the right degrees and certifications to take advantage of advanced manufacturing careers in electric vehicles and other high-tech fields. 

Initiatives like Conexus Indiana are hard at work bringing private industry and higher education together to create up-to-date manufacturing training programs, and marketing these career paths to young people through its ‘Dream It. Do It.’ campaign.  Purdue and Ivy Tech Community College received a $6 million federal stimulus grant to create specific degree and technical programs for electric vehicles, and the state’s Department of Workforce Development is also focused on green job training.  At the K-12 level, it’s critical that technical education programs are spared from budget cuts to get students on the right track early on.

These efforts have to be a top priority for policymakers, educators and manufacturers alike.  Pursuing economic development without a parallel focus on education will ultimately frustrate the ambitions of both the companies that can’t find skilled workers to fulfill their growth plans and the Hoosiers who find themselves unqualified for better jobs. 

Announcements like EnerDel’s are great news for Indiana’s economy; a steady supply of talented workers has been a catalyst for this success.  But we also have to keep a proactive focus on tomorrow’s workforce to keep the momentum going.  Looking ahead, degrees and certificates awarded are economic development metrics just like jobs and investment – the path towards a green advanced manufacturing economy for Indiana starts in the classroom.

Loughrey is the retired Vice-Chairman of Cummins, and chairs the Conexus Indiana and Energy Systems Network initiatives for the Central Indiana Corporate Partnership.

The last week has brought positive stories from several areas of the Indiana economy that are represented by CICP initiatives – anecdotal evidence that these industry clusters continue to represent our best prospects for future growth.

Last week, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) officials traveled to Indianapolis-based EnerDel to meet with company officials and representatives of Central Indiana’s clean technology industry, recognizing our region’s emerging leadership position in vehicle electrification.

EnerDel, the only U.S. manufacturer of advanced lithium-ion batteries for hybrid and plug-in electric vehicles, received a $118.5 million grant from the Department of Energy through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) in August.  EnerDel and other partners have also joined in a major demonstration project of electric vehicles in the Greater Indianapolis region, dubbed Project Plug-IN, under the auspices of CICP’s Energy Systems Network (ESN) initiative.

The DOE team led by Gil Sperling, Senior Advisor to the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, highlighted both developments, applauding EnerDel’s role in enhancing U.S. innovation and manufacturing capacity in clean energy and recognizing Project Plug-IN as an important initiative that will help make plug-in electric vehicles a practical choice for the American driver.  Indiana’s growing ‘green vehicle’ industry represents a great opportunity for both our energy and advanced manufacturing sectors.

In logistics, s2f Worldwide, a third-party logistics and supply chain service provider, chose to locate its operations in Plainfield this week, a deal projected to create 250 new jobs by 2013.  Central Indiana continues to strengthen our position as a global distribution hub, leveraging our strong infrastructure and inherent geographic advantages into new logistics opportunities.  Our Conexus Indiana initiative is poised to release a comprehensive logistics strategic plan for the state, and is also working to expand intermodal capabilities at the Avon railyard in Hendricks County, putting the region in an even stronger position going forward. 

Indiana continues to rank among the top ten states in logistics employment per capita – these efforts are paying off in good jobs for Hoosiers.

And finally, in technology, I was struck by an interview on Inside Indiana Business with Gerry Dick with Bill Godfrey, Chairman of on-demand marketing software provider Aprimo.  Godfrey asserts that Indiana is becoming a market leader in the e-marketing arena, with companies like ExactTarget, ChaCha, Compendium, Cantaloupe and others joining Aprimo here.  Jim Jay, President of our TechPoint initiative, wrote a piece on this very topic at about this time last year – check it out here.

And speaking of TechPoint, the organization has extended the deadline for its Mira Awards, celebrating Indiana’s high-tech success stories – go here to nominate an Indiana technology innovator today.

Spring is finally right around the corner - to belabor a metaphor, stories like these appearing with greater frequency seem to foreshadow an economic thaw for Indiana to match the warming weather.

Last week, our Central Indiana Transit Task Force publicly released its final report, presenting its recommendations to policymakers and the citizens of the region.  This report lays out a regional multi-modal transportation system with financing and governance recommendations, backed up with a rigorous cost-benefit analysis.  Now that the Task Force findings are in the public domain, we’re kicking off a year-long input campaign  – Indy Connect – that will invite a dialogue about Central Indiana’s transportation future, using our plan as a starting point.

I’d like to again thank co-chairs Al Hubbard, Bob Palmer and John Neighbours for their leadership, and all of the Task Force members – including CICP co-chair Jo Ann Gora – for their energy and insight in crafting this impressive study.

Their work will serve the region well.  We’ve lacked an integrated, forward-looking plan for regional transportation, and have paid the cost in terms of economic competitiveness, workforce connectivity, the vitality of our urban core and the potential for new investment and neighborhood redevelopment.  Our blueprint addresses all of these issues; now it’s up to elected officials and the public across the region to make the plan their own and decide if they’re willing to invest in it.  Please offer your two cents at indyconnect.org.

As the public thinks about transit, it’s important to understand the tremendous economic development impact that transit can have – I hope you’ll take a moment to read this excellent editorial from this weekend’s Star from Chuck Cagann of Mansur Real Estate, a Transit Task Force member, that addresses this issue:

Transit investments mean economic payoffs

When we think about economic development, we're likely to focus on tax breaks and other incentives for growing companies, competing against other regions for business opportunities.

That's true, but it's only one part of a bigger picture.  I'd argue that economic development has to be tied to what kind of community we want to build for ourselves and our families:  Do our citizens have access to diverse job opportunities?  Is our region growing?  Do we have great housing options, with thriving retail establishments and other amenities to serve our neighborhoods?

If we embrace this broader definition of economic development, then it's clear to me that a strong regional mass transit system is an important catalyst.

I was proud to serve on the Central Indiana Transit Task Force, a private sector-led group that last week unveiled a comprehensive transportation plan that includes strategic highway investments and an expanded regional bus system connected with light rail to serve the metropolitan area.

As business leaders, we understand a good investment when we see it – regional mass transit is an investment that will pay off in a healthier economy for employers, for taxpayers, for all of us.

Mass transit has been shown to create significant economic investment, as dense commercial and residential development grows along the transit lines.  For example, the Portland streetcar system has generated $1.4 billion along its 4.7 mile loop since 2001, a handsome return on its $300 million cost.  In Cleveland, more than $4 billion in private development is planned or in progress along the Euclid Avenue light rail corridor.  In Dallas, another $4.2 billion in business and new housing sprang up along the DART (Dallas Area Rapid Transit) system between 1999 and 2007.

This transit-oriented development boom can lead to higher property values and a broader tax base, easing the burden for other homeowners and businesses.  In Dallas, for example, high-value development along the DART lines is generating an estimated $127 million in additional tax revenues every year.  In Arlington, Virginia, half of all county property tax revenues are generated from its METRO transit corridors – allowing the county to maintain the lowest property tax rates in the region.

The right system will help our region attract and retain talented people, the skilled workforce that is a magnet for new business opportunities in our knowledge-based economy.  The regions of choice for educated workers provide diversity, arts and culture, an array of recreational amenities.  These regions also offer transit options – the ability to walk or bike to a rail or rapid bus station, to work on your laptop or chat with friends on the way to work.

By allowing employees to get to work more efficiently and affordably, a truly comprehensive regional system also allows local businesses to access a broader workforce, while giving commuters more disposable income to reinvest in the local economy rather than at the gas pump.

The Task Force strategy for mass transit is based on thoughtful planning and a rigorous cost-benefit analysis – but it’s only the beginning.  Now that this plan has been turned over to the public sector for action, every citizen will have an opportunity to weigh in during a series of public meetings and online at www.indyconnect.org. 

The dividends from investing in transit are many and far-reaching: Cutting commutes and putting more job opportunities within reach.  Connecting local businesses with more customers.  Spurring development that creates new jobs and tax revenues while rebuilding our neighborhoods.  The proposed transportation system may evolve over the next year, but it’s certain to be a winning economic development proposition  for all of us – please take part in the conversation and encourage your local elected officials to help turn this vision into reality.

Chuck Cagann is President of Mansur Real Estate Services; he serves on the Central Indiana Transit Task Force, which recently unveiled a strategy for a comprehensive regional transportation system.

The New Year has brought new opportunities for Indiana’s growing green manufacturing sector – the first few weeks of 2010 have seen several announcements that, collectively, show the momentum behind Hoosier manufacturing’s effort to electrify vehicles, make renewable energy sources a practical reality and more.

First, there was the news that Think North America had chosen Elkhart as the site of its first U.S. factory for its line of electric cars, joining Electric Motors Corp and NaviStar as the hub of a growing green vehicle cluster along Indiana’s northern border.

In Central Indiana, EnerDel – the only U.S. manufacturer of the cutting-edge lithium ion batteries that power hybrid and plug-in electric vehicles – announced a major manufacturing facility in Greenfield, Indiana, expanding a footprint that already includes its northeast Indianapolis headquarters and facilities in Hamilton County.  The Greenfield site will ultimately employ nearly 1,100.

Elsewhere, Brevini Wind (in Muncie) has earned $12.8 million in federal tax credits for its work manufacturing the gear boxes and other technologies for the turbines that generate electricity from wind.  Just two weeks ago, Secretary of Energy Chu visited Columbus to announce $54 million in federal stimulus grants to Cummins to increase engine efficiency.

Just like any technology-intensive, innovation-driven industry, a skilled workforce is a critical need for green manufacturing.  Here too, Indiana is moving forward – the state’s Department of Workforce Development recently earned a $6 million grant from the U.S. Department of Labor to create new curricula and retrain industrial workers from other sectors to take advantage of new green job opportunities.

Look for more announcements ahead from Indiana’s green manufacturing and clean technologies industries, as well as CICP’s Energy Systems Network initiative, as the state continues to solidify its position as a crossroads of energy innovation. 

December brings gifts for our economic growth

We haven't had many weeks, in good times or bad, like the week of Dec. 14, one that saw nearly $120 million invested in Indiana's future as a life sciences community.

The Indiana University School of Medicine's announcement on Dec. 15 was first: a monumental $60 million grant from Lilly Endowment to implement a new Indiana Physician Scientist Initiative. This wonderful grant has many features, but at its heart the funding will allow the medical school to recruit, retain and advance a highly promising pool of talent, including 20 physicians who are researchers and innovators as well as practitioners. These current and emerging leaders in fields such as cancer, neurological and mental illness and diabetes will be looked to for discoveries that can transform health care 0 Comments »

As we’ve reported in this space (here, here and here most recently), Indiana is making progress in building a more entrepreneurial economy, as measured by that most pragmatic of indicators – the amount of capital that private sector investors are willing to commit to the success of promising young companies.

The life sciences sector has led the way in this regard, and earlier this week our BioCrossroads initiative announced another major milestone in this journey towards a more diverse and dynamic ‘bio-economy:’ the creation of the $58 million INext Fund, the successor to the successful Indiana Future Fund announced six years ago as one of BioCrossroads’ first major initiatives.

INext, like the Future Fund, is supported by major institutional investors  - Eli Lilly, IU and Purdue, the Indiana State Teachers Retirement Fund, the University of Notre Dame and the Fairbanks Foundation – and will function as a ‘fund of funds.’  That is, INext will not invest directly in start-up firms, but rather in local and national venture capital firms that will in turn focus on Indiana opportunities.  This strategy lessens the risk to the Fund’s investors, and also attracts a broader pool of capital to Indiana. 

The Indiana Future Fund has been a rousing success, and support for the INext Fund shows the continued commitment among  the state’s corporate, public and university investors for continuing the strategy.  Here is the full press release on INext:

Indianapolis, Dec. 16, 2009 - Capitalizing on the continued strong growth of Indiana's life sciences industry and an active venture capital market, leaders from BioCrossroads, Eli Lilly and Company, Indiana State Teachers Retirement Fund, Indiana University, Purdue University, the University of Notre Dame, Richard M. Fairbanks Foundation, and Credit Suisse today announced the establishment of the INext Fund, a $58 million venture capital fund of funds.

Organized through BioCrossroads, Indiana's initiative to grow, expand and invest in the life sciences, and managed by the Credit Suisse Customized Fund Investment Group, the INext Fund includes investments from Lilly, the Indiana State Teachers Retirement Fund (TRF), IU, Purdue, Notre Dame, and the Fairbanks Foundation. This fund of funds is a capital pool that will invest in venture capital funds that are focused on the life sciences, thus encouraging and facilitating direct investment in Indiana life sciences opportunities.

"Six years ago, we launched the Indiana Future Fund to stimulate and grow Indiana's venture capital sector, and we've made incredible progress building a market where VC firms, both local and out of state, are investing in our promising life sciences companies," said David Johnson, president and CEO, BioCrossroads. "Launching a follow-on fund like the appropriately named INext Fund is proof of concept of BioCrossroads' mission, and evidence of the substantial market opportunities here in Indiana to put private equity to work. Capital formation is a huge problem for every region across the U.S., but Indiana's institutional investors have once again proven ready, willing and able to build and maintain strong funding sources for our entrepreneurial companies."

Lilly, one of the original participants in the Indiana Future Fund (IFF), has committed an investment in the INext Fund.

"The INext Fund will be a catalyst for the continued growth of Indiana's life sciences. Our investment in the fund is smart not only from Lilly's business perspective, but we also view it as a part of a collaborative effort to strengthen our community," said Bart Peterson, Senior Vice President of Corporate Affairs, Eli Lilly and Company. "Lilly's investment strategy is to find the best opportunities, and we look all over the world to find them. It just so happens that some of the best innovations are happening in our own backyard."

The Indiana Future Fund, a $73 million fund, has been the life blood of 14 Indiana life sciences companies, and continues to provide the foundation for Indiana's venture capital growth. The IFF has also been a trailblazer in securing additional capital from beyond Indiana for Indiana companies, helping to bring over $160 million to Indiana start-ups from venture capital firms across the country.

"Given the current challenges in the U.S. economy, building a return-driven fund of this magnitude is very impressive," said Phil Belt of Credit Suisse's Indianapolis office. "Indiana's life sciences industry is full of both promise and opportunity, and progress continues to be made. This state is now a life sciences leader and is on the map for venture capital firms from the east and west coasts and points in between."

Indiana has seen an increase in the number of entrepreneurial life sciences companies, both university-based and private start ups, since the formation of the IFF. One of the investments that the IFF firms made in 2006 was BioStorage Technologies, an Indianapolis based biomaterials storage and inventory management company. Since that time, BioStorage has tripled its workforce, announced a $6.1 million investment in a new facility in Indianapolis and will add another 125 employees by 2012.

"We brought this group of industry, university and community leaders together with a common goal -- to generate good returns on investment while doing good for our community," said Darren Carroll, vice president, Lilly New Ventures and chairman of the INext Advisory Committee. "This is how public-private partnerships work -- giving Indiana's life science companies the opportunity to compete and win in the global economy."

 "We continue to see promising innovations from our technology transfer offices more than 170 patents and 50 companies have come through the Purdue Research Foundation over the last six years," said Purdue University President France Córdova. "Having a vibrant venture capital community and bringing in new dollars from outside the state to help these companies grow is imperative. This funding builds the companies that will advance the life sciences and improve the health of Indiana's citizens."

Indiana University is tapping investments and private contributions to stimulate Indiana's economy. No tax or tuition dollars are involved. In early December, IU announced the formation of the $10 million Innovate Indiana Fund. "With incubators cropping up all over the state and breakthrough research coming out of our university labs, there continues to be great discoveries in our life sciences," said Indiana University President Michael McRobbie. "The INext Fund provides us with another way we can direct capital to talented and innovative companies and gives them another funding resource."

"By investing in INext, Notre Dame is supporting the advancement of the life-sciences industry in Indiana and throughout the nation, with the hope that this support will lead to new applications that will benefit the lives of many and also create successful businesses. It is a good investment from many perspectives," said Thomas Burish, Provost, University of Notre Dame.

Along with corporate and university investments, the INext Fund has received an investment commitment from Indiana's Teachers Retirement Fund as well as the Richard M. Fairbanks Foundation.

'Indiana's robust life sciences industry is one of the key drivers of our economy, and investing in INext is expected to deliver investment returns by capitalizing on that strength," said Steve Russo, Executive Director of the Indiana State Teachers Retirement Fund.

"The Richard M. Fairbanks Foundation is participating in the INext Fund both because we believe it is a good investment, but also because it is supportive of our goal of strengthening the economic vitality of our community," said Leonard J. Betley, president of the Richard M. Fairbanks Foundation.

About BioCrossroads
BioCrossroads (www.biocrossroads.com) is Indiana’s initiative to grow, advance and invest in the life sciences, a public-private collaboration that supports the region’s existing research and corporate strengths while encouraging new business development. BioCrossroads provides money and support to life sciences businesses, launches new life sciences enterprises (Indiana Health Information Exchange, Fairbanks Institute for Healthy Communities, BioCrossroadsLINX, and Datalys Center), expands collaboration and partnerships among Indiana's life science institutions, promotes science education and markets Indiana's life sciences industry.